• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families

A national effort to protect families from toxic chemicals.

  • Get Involved
  • Our Work
    • News
    • Public Policy
    • Mind the Store
    • Successes
  • Get the Facts
  • About
  • Donate

Tony Iallonardo / April 23, 2014

New house draft chemical bill remains a setback

Washington, DC – House Energy and Commerce Environment and the Economy Subcommittee Chairman John Shimkus (R-IL) today unveiled a redraft of legislation purporting to modernize the nation’s outdated chemical laws. The previous draft has been criticized by public health and environment groups for rolling back some of the few protections provided by current law.

The draft comes in advance of a hearing to consider the bill on April 29.

Andy Igrejas, director of Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families, a coalition of business, labor and NGO groups seeking chemical policy reform said:

“We appreciate Chairman Shimkus releasing a new discussion draft of the Chemicals in Commerce Act that attempts to address some of the concerns raised by public health, labor, business and environmental advocates. While we are still reviewing the details, our preliminary analysis is that the new draft remains a step backwards from the status quo of chemical oversight in the U.S. and is therefore not worthy of support.”

Igrejas pointed to several areas of concern:

  • The weakening of EPA’s oversight of new chemicals in the previous draft has been scaled back, but EPA still has less authority to regulate or require testing of new chemicals than existing law.
  • The use of cost-benefit in the bill in regulating existing chemicals has been clarified, but it will likely still prevent EPA from implementing common-sense restrictions on chemicals that flunk a safety review.
  • The pre-emption of state programs has been scaled back slightly, but is still sweeping and goes far beyond existing law.
  • EPA has been provided with authority to order testing for purposes of prioritizing a chemical, but the authority is so heavily qualified that it may prove difficult to use in practice.
  • The “low priority category” in the bill has been tightened somewhat, but it still holds the potential that hundreds of chemicals will be treated as safe without a thorough safety review.
  • The draft explicitly would allow companies to mask the identity of a chemical linked to toxic health effects.
Share
Tweet

Filed Under: Policy & Regulation Tagged With: Andy Igrejas, Chairman John Shimkus, EPA, healthy families, House Energy and Commerce Environment and the Economy Subcommittee, low priority category, pre-emption, safer chemicals

Primary Sidebar

person stripping paint

Tell Biden’s EPA: Ban this deadly chemical from the workplace

Take Action

Subscribe to Posts

Get our latest posts delivered to your inbox.

Get the Facts

These chemicals are linked to serious environmental and health problems. Check out our fact sheets, which draw from the leading peer-reviewed science.

  • Bisphenol A (BPA) & Bisphenol S (BPS)
  • Formaldehyde
  • Methylene chloride
  • Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic Chemicals (PBTs)
  • PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances)
  • Phthalates
  • Toxic flame retardants
Other Chemicals »

Footer

Contact Us

200 Massachusetts Ave NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20001
Email

Search

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

© 2021 Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families — All rights reserved.

  • About Us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Feed